A case of intra-abdominal abscess caused by unconsciously ingestion of fish bone in elderly patient

Article information

Kosin Med J. 2018;33(3):415-421

Publication date (electronic) : 2018 December 31

doi : https://doi.org/10.7180/kmj.2018.33.3.415

Bo Ra Kim , Hong Jun Kim , Jong Ryeal Hahm , Chang Yoon Ha , Woon Tae Jung , Ok Jae Lee

Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea.

Corresponding Author: Hong Jun Kim, Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital Gyeongsang National University Hospital 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinjusi, Korea. Tel: +82-55-750-8466, Fax: +82-55-750-8466, khj9454@hanmail.net

Received 2016 June 23; Revised 2016 October 07; Accepted 2016 October 12.

Abstract

Cases showing complications such as esophageal injury, deep neck infection, and mediastinitis caused by accidental ingestion of fish bone are common. But ingestion of fish bone rarely causes perforation of the gastrointestinal tract or an intra-abdominal abscess.

We report herein a case of a 78-year-old man with a periumbilical mesenteric abscess caused by fish bone which was ingested unconsciously. The fish bone was found in the terminal ileum and it was removed by colonoscopy. The patient improved and he was discharged after systemic antibiotic therapy. Occasionally, when patients swallow fish bone without a foreign body sensation, clinicians should suspect perforation caused by fish bone in case of an intra-abdominal abscess of unknown cause.

Keywords: Colonoscopy; Elderly patient; Fish bone; Mesenteric abscess

Cases of esophageal injury, deep neck infection, and mediastinitis caused by accidental ingestion of a fish bone have frequently been reported in the previous papers. However, intestinal perforation or development of an intra-abdominal abscess caused by ingestion of fish bone is rare. Abscess formation can occur secondary to a penetrating injury to a segment of the small or large intestine due to a sharp, ingested foreign body.

Herein, we describe a case of a 78-year-old man who developed an intra-abdominal abscess caused by fish bone. An abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrated a 5 cm cystic, contrast-enhancing lesion with adjacent fatty infiltration of the periumbilical mesentery. The diagnosis of a periumbilical mesenteric abscess caused by a foreign body, ultimately identified to be a fish bone, was confirmed following colonoscopy. On further history taking, the patient did not recall swallowing a fish bone.

CASE

A 78-year-old man visited the emergency department with a complaint of abdominal pain of 10 days duration. His vital signs were as follows: blood pressure, 160/80 mmHg; pulse rate, 75 beats/min; and body temperature, 36.7 ℃. On physical examination, he exhibited moderate tenderness to palpation over the periumbilical area, but there was no evidence of rebound tenderness or guarding. Bowel sounds were normal and present in all 4 quadrants. There was no palpable mass. The initial laboratory findings were as follows: white blood cell count, 7,690 mm³ (neutrophils 59.7%); hemoglobin, 13.8 g/dL; platelets, 230,000/mm³; BUN, 12.7 mg/dL; creatinine, 0.71 mg/dL; and C-reactive protein, 86.1 mg/dL. Abdominal x-ray revealed no abnormal findings. The abdominal CT scan revealed a 5 cm cystic lesion with a contrast-enhancing wall associated with adjacent fatty infiltration of the periumbilical mesentery (Fig. 1). Ultrasonographyguided aspiration of the cyst demonstrated pus from which Klebsiella pneumoniae was isolated. Colonoscopic examination was performed, and it revealed that the cause of the intra-abdominal abscess was a 2 cm, sharp fish bone located in the terminal ileum. The foreign body was removed by forceps (Fig. 2, 3).

Fig. 1

Initial abdominal computed tomographic scan revealed an approximately 5cm cystic lesion with contrast enhancement of the wall associated with adjacent fatty infiltration within the periumbilical mesentery.

Fig. 2

A sharp fish bone was observed in the terminal ileum and removed by forceps.

Fig. 3

The fish bone was 2 cm in length and sharp.

When asked about his diet, the patient had not recently experienced a foreign body sensation during meal times. After administration of ampicillin and sulbactam for 11 days, followed by oral amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium for 30 days, his symptoms improved and the abscess was not seen on the follow up CT 7 weeks after his presentation (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

The abscess was not visible in the follow up CT scan in 7 weeks.

DISCUSSION

Our case demonstrates the diagnostic and therapeutic utility of colonoscopy in the evaluation and management of an intra-abdominal abscess. Intra-abdominal abscesses can develop secondary to hollow viscus perforation and may occasionally mimic the presentation of colon cancer.1 2 In addition, intra-abdominal abscesses can develop secondary to localized peritonitis, which is usually due to direct microbial inoculation following trauma or recent surgery. Abscesses most commonly develop secondary to appendicitis (59%), diverticulitis (26%), surgical procedures (11%), and due to undetermined causes (4%).3 In this particular case, the cause of the intra-abdominal abscess was unveiled as a fish bone located in the terminal ileum, and ultimately, it was removed by colonoscopy.

Most ingested foreign bodies pass through the gastrointestinal tract within one week.4 Fish bone ingestion is common, but intestinal perforation due to fish bone ingestion is rare. The risk of perforation is related to the length and shape of the foreign body ingested. While intestinal perforation due to fish bone ingestion is rare, the perforation rate reaches up to 15%–35% when the ingested foreign object is sharp.5 6 Esophageal perforation caused by a foreign body is even rarer. High mortality associated with this condition results from the lack of clinical suspicion and late initiation of treatment. Fish bones are the most commonly ingested foreign objects that cause bowel perforation.7 Most perforations occur at areas of anatomical narrowing and angulation segments of the gastrointestinal tract, and, for these reasons, the most common sites of perforation are the ileocecal and rectosigmoid regions.8 Foreign body may cause intestinal perforation and it may lead to the development of a liver abscess, enteric fistula, intestinal obstruction, as well as peritonitis. In most cases, the ingested foreign bodies are confined to the extraluminal space, without any penetration of adjacent organs (Table 1).

Table 1

Reported complications of fish bone ingestion

Fish bone ingestion can cause pancreatitis, appendicitis, and liver abscess as well as intra-abdominal abscess.9 10 11 The most common clinical features of intra-abdominal perforations caused by foreign body ingestion are abdominal pain, fever, and localized peritonitis.12 Plain radiography, ultrasound, CT, upper gastrointestinal series, upper endoscopy, colonoscopy, and laparotomy can be used to detect/identify foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract.13 Fish bones are usually invisible on a plain film. A CT scan of the abdomen is helpful to detect fish bones.14 However, fish bone in the hollow viscus is not detected by a CT scan and a definitive preoperative history of ingestion of a foreign body is usually uncertain as in our case. Therefore, accurate determination of the cause of an intra-abdominal abscess before operation can be difficult. Therefore, in patients who cannot recall swallowing a foreign body, and who are found to have an abscess of unknown origin on imaging, colonoscopy may be indicated to evaluate this possibility. If a foreign body is embedded within the abscess, an open laparotomy and removal of the foreign body is the recommended treatment of choice.15 Especialy in case of elderly people, the masticatory function may be deteriorated due to tooth problem. Hence, they are likely to be at a greater risk of ingesting a foreign body unconsciously during meal times.

In our case, conservative management was chosen, and the abscess resolved after colonoscopic retrieval followed by treatment with systemic antibiotics.

When a patient presents with an intra-abdominal abscess of unknown cause, the possibility of foreign body ingestion must be considered even though the patient denies having swallowed any foreign body.

References

1. Omoto T, Endo S, Ikehara K, Hidaka E, Ishida F, Tanaka J, et al. [A case of cecal cancer with abdominal wall abscess]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2012;39:297–299.

2. Lizarralde E, Martínez Odriozola P, Tobalina I, Maniega R, Miguel F. [Intra-abdominal abscess as presentation of colonic cancer]. An Med Interna 2000;17:32–34.

3. Kumar RR, Kim JT, Haukoos JS, Macias LH, Dixon MR, Stamos MJ, et al. Factors affecting the successful management of intra-abdominal abscesses with antibiotics and the need for percutaneous drainage. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:183–189.

4. Abel RM, Fischer JE, Hendren WH. Penetration of the alimentary tract by a foreign body with migration to the liver. Arch Surg 1971;102:227–228.

5. Henderson CT, Engel J, Schlesinger P. Foreign body ingestion: review and suggested guidelines for management. Endoscopy 1987;19:68–71.

6. Vizcarrondo FJ, Brady PG, Nord HJ. Foreign bodies of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointest Endosc 1983;29:208–210.

7. Leijonmarck CE, Fenyö G, Räf L. Nontraumatic perforation of the small intestine. Acta Chir Scand 1984;150:405–411.

8. Singh RP, Gardner JA. Perforation of the sigmoid colon by swallowed chicken bone: case reports and review of literature. Int Surg 1981;66:181–183.

9. Dabadie A, Roussey M, Betremieux P, Gambert C, Lefrancois C, Darnault P. Acute pancreatitis from a duodenal foreign body in a child. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1989;8:533–535.

10. Sukhotnik I, Klin B, Siplovich L. Foreign-body appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 1995;30:1515–1516.

11. Broome CJ, Peck RJ. Hepatic abscess complicating foreign body perforation of the gastric antrum: an ultrasound diagnosis. Clin Radiol 2000;55:242–243.

12. Goh BK, Chow PK, Quah HM, Ong HS, Eu KW, Ooi LL, et al. Perforation of the gastrointestinal tract secondary to ingestion of foreign bodies. World J Surg 2006;30:372–377.

13. Lee KF, Chu W, Wong SW, Lai PB. Hepatic abscess secondary to foreign body perforation of the stomach. Asian J Surg 2005;28:297–300.

14. Ngan JH, Fok PJ, Lai EC, Branicki FJ, Wong J. A prospective study on fish bone ingestion. Experience of 358 patients. Ann Surg 1990;211:459–462.

15. Chen CK, Su YJ, Lai YC, Cheng HK, Chang WH. Fish bone-related intra-abdominal abscess in an elderly patient. Int J Infect Dis 2010;14:e171–e172.

Article information Continued

Kosin University College of Medicine

(open-access) :

Articles published in Kosin Medical Journal are open-access, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Fig. 1

Initial abdominal computed tomographic scan revealed an approximately 5cm cystic lesion with contrast enhancement of the wall associated with adjacent fatty infiltration within the periumbilical mesentery.