Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.

Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture with Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty of Hip in Elderly Population-Short-term Results-

Article information

Kosin Med J. 2012;27(1):37-43
Publication date (electronic) : 2012 June 11
doi : https://doi.org/10.7180/kmj.2012.27.1.37
Gun Woo Lee, Jae-Man Kwak, So Hak Chung
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kosin University, Busan, Korea.
Corresponding Author: So Hak Chung, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kosin University, 34 Amnamdong, Seo-gu 602-702 Busan, Korea. TEL: 051) 990-6237, FAX: 051) 243-0181, shchung@kosin.ac.kr
Received 2011 October 18; Revised 2012 March 24; Accepted 2012 April 30.

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study is to evaluate the short-term results and complications of treating the intertrochanteric fracture with bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) in elderly population.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 31 unstable intertrochanteric fracture patients who were treated with BHA between January 2007 and August 2009 in older populations more than 65 years old. The 6 males and 25 females had a mean age of 79.8 years (range: 66-88) and a mean follow-up of 36.3 months (range: 24-55). We analyzed the radiological outcomes, functional recovery grade, using Jensen's social function score and Harris hip score (HHS), and complications.

Results

The average operation time and blood loss was 148.9 min (range, 110-215 min) and 455.2 mL (range, 200-1200 mL). Mean preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) was 10.9 g/dL (range, 8.6-13.4 g/dL) and 10.5 g/dL (range, 5.1-14.1 g/dL) respectively. Average 1.3 pints of blood transfusion was performed. Ambulation with (or without) crutch was possible at mean 6.8 days postoperatively. The stability and alignment indices were adequate in all cases at final follow-up. On clinical results, the average HHS score, was changed from 79.7 points (range, 44-100) preoperatively to 73.0 points (range, 46-92) postoperatively, and the preoperative and postoperative Jensen's score was 1.8 (range, 1-3) and 2.1 (range, 1-4) respectively.

Conclusions

The BHA is an acceptable alternative for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in older population.

Keywords: Bipolar hemiarthroplasty; Femur; Unstable Intertrochanteric fracture

References

1. Templeman D, Baumgaertner MR, Leighton RK, Lindsey RW, Moed BR. Reducing complications in the surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Instr Course Lect 2005. 54409–415.
2. Lee JY, Kim SH, Song JH. Surgical treatment with proximal femoral nail for intertrochanteric fracture of the femur in elderly patients. J Korean Hip Soc 2008. 201–6.
3. Gotfried Y. The lateral trochanteric wall: a key element in the reconstruction of unstable peritrochanteric hip fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004. 42582–86.
4. Bridle SH, Patel AD, Bircher M, Calvert PT. Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991. 73330–334.
5. Butt MS, Krikler SJ, Nafie S, Ali MS. Comparison of dynamic hip screw and gamma nail: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Injury 1995. 26615–618.
6. Haidukewych GJ, Israel TA, Berry DJ. Reverse obliquity fractures of the intertrochanteric region of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001. 83643–650.
7. Im GI, Shin YW, Song YJ. Potentially unstable intertrochanteric fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2005. 195–9.
8. Kim SY, Noh JH. Management of femoral peritrochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nail. J Korean Orthop Assoc 2006. 41541–546.
9. Engh CA, Glassman AH, Suthers KE. The case for porous-coated hip implants. The femoral side. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990. 26163–81.
10. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990. 257107–128.
11. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979. 14117–27.
12. Iagulli ND, Mallory TH, Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Russell JH, Adams JB, et al. A simple and accurate method for determining leg length in primary total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 2006. 35455–457.
13. Albareda J, Laderiga A, Palanca D, Paniagua L, Seral F. Complications and technical problems with the gamma nail. Int Orthop 1996. 2047–50.
14. Kayali C, Agus H, Ozluk S, Sanli C. Treatment for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients: internal fixation versus cone hemiarthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2006. 14240–244.
15. Simmermacher RK, Bosch AM, Van der Werken C. The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail (PFN): A new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury 1999. 30327–332.
16. Grimsrud C, Monzon RJ, Richman J, Ries MD. Cemented hip arthroplasty with a novel cerclage cable technique for unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Arthroplasty 2005. 20337–343.
17. Lee JM, Kim KY. Treatment of unstable trochanteric fracture using sliding hip screw with wiring of lesser trochanter. J Korean Orthop Assoc 2000. 35861–866.
18. Nuber S, Schonweiss T, Ruter A. [Stabilisation of unstable trochanteric femoral fractures. Dynamic hip screw (DHS) with trochanteric stabilisation plate vs. proximal femur nail (PFN)]. Unfallchirurg 2003. 10639–47.
19. Geiger F, Zimmermann-Stenzel M, Heisel C, Lehner B, Daecke W. Trochanteric fractures in the elderly: the influence of primary hip arthroplasty on 1-year mortality. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2007. 127959–966.
20. Haidukewych GJ, Berry DJ. Hip arthroplasty for salvage of failed treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003. 85-A899–904.
21. Green S, Moore T, Proano F. Bipolar prosthetic replacement for the management of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures in the elderly. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987. 224169–177.
22. Al-yassari G, Langstaff RJ, Jones JW, Al-Lami M. The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable trochanteric femoral fracture. Injury 2002. 33395–399.
23. Herrera A, Domingo LJ, Calvo A, Martinez A, Cuenca J. A comparative study of trochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma nail or the proximal femoral nail. Int Orthop 2002. 26365–369.
24. Overgaard S, Jensen TT, Bonde G, Mossing NB. The uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures. 6-year follow-up of 171 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1991. 62115–120.
25. Moon KH, Kang JS, Cho KJ, Lee DJ, Yeom JS. Hip hemiarthroplasty using extensively porous coated femoral stem in femoral neck fracture aged 70 years or older. J Korean Orthop Assoc 2004. 39785–789.

Article information Continued

Copyright © 2012 Kosin University College of Medicine

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

(A) Pelvic radiograph showed the unstable intertrochanteric fracture of right femur. (B) On postoperative radiograph, well-fixed and aligned stem and cup was seen. (C) At 28 months postoperatively, radiolucent line of zone 1 was noted between cement and cortex. However, stem stability was maintained.

Table 1

The assessment of social function of Jensen

Table 1

Table 2

Summarized data of patients about operative, functional outcomes and complications

Table 2

HHS: Harris hip score, El: Elective, EM: Emergency.

Table 3

Published literature regarding treatment methods

Table 3

BHA: Bipolar hemiarthroplasty, PFN: Proximal femoral nail, D/L: Dislocation.